On Tue, Jun 05, 2007, Olivier Kaloudoff wrote:
> > So, please bootstrap a fresh instance again under Mac OS X and try to
> > build up to Apache with SSL support or whatever else and give feedback.
> > At least the problems under Mac OS X now should be a lot less than
> > before...
>
> openpkg-20070604 bootstrap compiled without a single glitch on i386 and ppc
> (g4) .. great work :-)
>
> openpkg-20070604-20070604.i386-macosx10.4-ope.sh
> openpkg-20070604-20070604.ppc-macosx10.4-ope.sh
Ah, good. OTOH, the i386 "architecture product" actually should be ix86
to be consistent with the other platform identifiers (who use i386 for
the "architecture technology" but ix86 for the "architecture product").
Now fixed, too.
> for the moment, on the i386, I have to create two virtual packages,
> as suggested by Bill (binutils and gcc).
A "gcc" package should be enough as this is the only one requiring
"binutils". OTOH, is GCC or Binutils the actual problem under Mac OS X?
I guess it is Binutils and stock GCC works, right? Or in other words:
would it work if we use the "gcc" package but without the "binutils"
package (instead the system ld/as etc are used)?
Ralf S. Engelschall
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.engelschall.com
______________________________________________________________________
OpenPKG http://openpkg.org
User Communication List openpkg-users@openpkg.org
