Hi Zoran, Reviewed and tested the patch. Ack with following comments.
comments: while compilation following errors occurred please correct this: a. cc1: warnings being treated as errors imm_cfg.c: In function ‘stdreadline’: imm_cfg.c:884: warning: implicit declaration of function ‘getline’ make[5]: *** [immcfg-imm_cfg.o] Error 1 make[5]: Leaving directory `/home/staging/patches/imm/staging_20/osaf/tools/safimm/immcfg' make[4]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 add : #define _GNU_SOURCE to the file imm_cfg.c b. imm_cfg.c: In function ‘imm_operation’: imm_cfg.c:946: warning: ‘rc’ may be used uninitialized in this function make: *** [immcfg-imm_cfg.o] Error 1 add: rc=0 Thanks, Neel. On Thursday 18 July 2013 06:57 PM, Zoran Milinkovic wrote: > Summary: IMMTOOLS: add transactions to immcfg [#20] > Review request for Trac Ticket(s): 20 > Peer Reviewer(s): Neel, Anders > Pull request to: Zoran > Affected branch(es): default(4.4) > Development branch: > > -------------------------------- > Impacted area Impact y/n > -------------------------------- > Docs n > Build system n > RPM/packaging n > Configuration files n > Startup scripts n > SAF services y > OpenSAF services n > Core libraries n > Samples n > Tests n > Other n > > > Comments (indicate scope for each "y" above): > --------------------------------------------- > > changeset 0ed7f10cc24733dde0f99720aacec7e9ff6b4bdd > Author: Zoran Milinkovic <zoran.milinko...@ericsson.com> > Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2013 15:13:34 +0200 > > IMMTOOLS: add transactions to immcfg [#20] > > immcfg without parameters runs in transaction mode. immcfg operations in > transaction mode can be accepted from a pipe, a file or stdin (command > line). Ctrl+D commit a transaction and exit. Ctrl+C abort a transaction > and > exit. > > > Complete diffstat: > ------------------ > osaf/tools/safimm/immcfg/imm_cfg.c | 794 > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------------------------------- > osaf/tools/safimm/immcfg/imm_import.cc | 908 > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------------------------------- > 2 files changed, 1238 insertions(+), 464 deletions(-) > > > Testing Commands: > ----------------- > immcfg > cat testfile.cfg | immcfg > immcfg < testfile.cfg > > > Testing, Expected Results: > -------------------------- > Run immcfg in a command line mode, ex: "immcfg" > Use a pipe as the input, ex: "cat testfile.cfg | immcfg" > Use a file as the input, ex: "immcfg < testfile.cfg" > > > Conditions of Submission: > ------------------------- > Ack from Neel and Anders > > > Arch Built Started Linux distro > ------------------------------------------- > mips n n > mips64 n n > x86 n n > x86_64 n n > powerpc n n > powerpc64 n n > > > Reviewer Checklist: > ------------------- > [Submitters: make sure that your review doesn't trigger any checkmarks!] > > > Your checkin has not passed review because (see checked entries): > > ___ Your RR template is generally incomplete; it has too many blank entries > that need proper data filled in. > > ___ You have failed to nominate the proper persons for review and push. > > ___ Your patches do not have proper short+long header > > ___ You have grammar/spelling in your header that is unacceptable. > > ___ You have exceeded a sensible line length in your headers/comments/text. > > ___ You have failed to put in a proper Trac Ticket # into your commits. > > ___ You have incorrectly put/left internal data in your comments/files > (i.e. internal bug tracking tool IDs, product names etc) > > ___ You have not given any evidence of testing beyond basic build tests. > Demonstrate some level of runtime or other sanity testing. > > ___ You have ^M present in some of your files. These have to be removed. > > ___ You have needlessly changed whitespace or added whitespace crimes > like trailing spaces, or spaces before tabs. > > ___ You have mixed real technical changes with whitespace and other > cosmetic code cleanup changes. These have to be separate commits. > > ___ You need to refactor your submission into logical chunks; there is > too much content into a single commit. > > ___ You have extraneous garbage in your review (merge commits etc) > > ___ You have giant attachments which should never have been sent; > Instead you should place your content in a public tree to be pulled. > > ___ You have too many commits attached to an e-mail; resend as threaded > commits, or place in a public tree for a pull. > > ___ You have resent this content multiple times without a clear indication > of what has changed between each re-send. > > ___ You have failed to adequately and individually address all of the > comments and change requests that were proposed in the initial review. > > ___ You have a misconfigured ~/.hgrc file (i.e. username, email etc) > > ___ Your computer have a badly configured date and time; confusing the > the threaded patch review. > > ___ Your changes affect IPC mechanism, and you don't present any results > for in-service upgradability test. > > ___ Your changes affect user manual and documentation, your patch series > do not contain the patch that updates the Doxygen manual. > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Learn the latest--Visual Studio 2012, SharePoint 2013, SQL 2012, more! Discover the easy way to master current and previous Microsoft technologies and advance your career. Get an incredible 1,500+ hours of step-by-step tutorial videos with LearnDevNow. Subscribe today and save! http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=58040911&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ Opensaf-devel mailing list Opensaf-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensaf-devel