Summary: IMMTEST: Cleanup the code and fix memory problem [#552]
Review request for Trac Ticket(s): 552
Peer Reviewer(s): Neel
Pull request to: Zoran
Affected branch(es): opensaf-4.3.x
Development branch: opensaf-4.3.x

--------------------------------
Impacted area       Impact y/n
--------------------------------
 Docs                    n
 Build system            n
 RPM/packaging           n
 Configuration files     n
 Startup scripts         n
 SAF services            n
 OpenSAF services        n
 Core libraries          n
 Samples                 n
 Tests                   y
 Other                   n


Comments (indicate scope for each "y" above):
---------------------------------------------

changeset 6e718b7dfad5d813286331a7498cdc3351591288
Author: Zoran Milinkovic <zoran.milinko...@ericsson.com>
Date:   Thu, 12 Sep 2013 04:40:23 -0400

        IMMTEST: Cleanup the code and fix memory problem [#552]


Complete diffstat:
------------------
 tests/immsv/common/immtest.c                                |   4 ++++
 tests/immsv/implementer/test_SaImmOiRtAttrUpdateCallbackT.c |   2 +-
 tests/immsv/implementer/test_cleanup.c                      |   2 +-
 tests/immsv/management/test_cleanup.c                       |   2 +-
 tests/immsv/management/test_saImmOmAdminOwnerFinalize.c     |   1 +
 tests/immsv/management/test_saImmOmInitialize.c             |   1 +
 tests/immsv/management/test_saImmOmSearchInitialize_2.c     |   2 +-
 tests/immsv/management/test_saImmOmThreadInterference.c     |  10 +++++++---
 8 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)


Testing Commands:
-----------------
valgrind --leak-check=full --show-reachable=yes --track-origins=yes immomtest
valgrind --leak-check=full --show-reachable=yes --track-origins=yes immoitest


Testing, Expected Results:
--------------------------
Valgrind should not report any memory leak.


Conditions of Submission:
-------------------------
Ack from Neel.


Arch      Built     Started    Linux distro
-------------------------------------------
mips        n          n
mips64      n          n
x86         n          n
x86_64      n          n
powerpc     n          n
powerpc64   n          n


Reviewer Checklist:
-------------------
[Submitters: make sure that your review doesn't trigger any checkmarks!]


Your checkin has not passed review because (see checked entries):

___ Your RR template is generally incomplete; it has too many blank entries
    that need proper data filled in.

___ You have failed to nominate the proper persons for review and push.

___ Your patches do not have proper short+long header

___ You have grammar/spelling in your header that is unacceptable.

___ You have exceeded a sensible line length in your headers/comments/text.

___ You have failed to put in a proper Trac Ticket # into your commits.

___ You have incorrectly put/left internal data in your comments/files
    (i.e. internal bug tracking tool IDs, product names etc)

___ You have not given any evidence of testing beyond basic build tests.
    Demonstrate some level of runtime or other sanity testing.

___ You have ^M present in some of your files. These have to be removed.

___ You have needlessly changed whitespace or added whitespace crimes
    like trailing spaces, or spaces before tabs.

___ You have mixed real technical changes with whitespace and other
    cosmetic code cleanup changes. These have to be separate commits.

___ You need to refactor your submission into logical chunks; there is
    too much content into a single commit.

___ You have extraneous garbage in your review (merge commits etc)

___ You have giant attachments which should never have been sent;
    Instead you should place your content in a public tree to be pulled.

___ You have too many commits attached to an e-mail; resend as threaded
    commits, or place in a public tree for a pull.

___ You have resent this content multiple times without a clear indication
    of what has changed between each re-send.

___ You have failed to adequately and individually address all of the
    comments and change requests that were proposed in the initial review.

___ You have a misconfigured ~/.hgrc file (i.e. username, email etc)

___ Your computer have a badly configured date and time; confusing the
    the threaded patch review.

___ Your changes affect IPC mechanism, and you don't present any results
    for in-service upgradability test.

___ Your changes affect user manual and documentation, your patch series
    do not contain the patch that updates the Doxygen manual.


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
How ServiceNow helps IT people transform IT departments:
1. Consolidate legacy IT systems to a single system of record for IT
2. Standardize and globalize service processes across IT
3. Implement zero-touch automation to replace manual, redundant tasks
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=51271111&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
Opensaf-devel mailing list
Opensaf-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensaf-devel

Reply via email to