I know, but valgrind reports a warning if searchHandle is not assign. Regards, Zoran
-----Original Message----- From: Neelakanta Reddy [mailto:reddy.neelaka...@oracle.com] Sent: den 16 september 2013 14:17 To: Zoran Milinkovic Cc: opensaf-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [PATCH 0 of 1] Review Request for IMMTEST: Cleanup the code and fix memory problem [#552] Hi Zoran, Reviewed the patch. Ack. minor comment: setting of searchHandle = -1 is not required for saImmOmSearchInitialize_2_04. /Neel. On Thursday 12 September 2013 02:43 PM, Zoran Milinkovic wrote: > Summary: IMMTEST: Cleanup the code and fix memory problem [#552] > Review request for Trac Ticket(s): 552 Peer Reviewer(s): Neel Pull > request to: Zoran Affected branch(es): opensaf-4.2.x Development > branch: opensaf-4.2.x > > -------------------------------- > Impacted area Impact y/n > -------------------------------- > Docs n > Build system n > RPM/packaging n > Configuration files n > Startup scripts n > SAF services n > OpenSAF services n > Core libraries n > Samples n > Tests y > Other n > > > Comments (indicate scope for each "y" above): > --------------------------------------------- > > changeset e6022b264cd131f768bf4ab1cbc32fb229fc9e01 > Author: Zoran Milinkovic <zoran.milinko...@ericsson.com> > Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2013 04:45:12 -0400 > > IMMTEST: Cleanup the code and fix memory problem [#552] > > > Complete diffstat: > ------------------ > tests/immsv/common/immtest.c | 8 +++++++- > tests/immsv/implementer/test_SaImmOiRtAttrUpdateCallbackT.c | 2 +- > tests/immsv/management/test_saImmOmAdminOwnerFinalize.c | 1 + > tests/immsv/management/test_saImmOmInitialize.c | 1 + > tests/immsv/management/test_saImmOmSearchInitialize_2.c | 2 +- > 5 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > > Testing Commands: > ----------------- > valgrind --leak-check=full --show-reachable=yes --track-origins=yes > immomtest valgrind --leak-check=full --show-reachable=yes > --track-origins=yes immoitest > > > Testing, Expected Results: > -------------------------- > Valgrind should not report any memory leak. > > > Conditions of Submission: > ------------------------- > Ack from Neel. > > > Arch Built Started Linux distro > ------------------------------------------- > mips n n > mips64 n n > x86 n n > x86_64 n n > powerpc n n > powerpc64 n n > > > Reviewer Checklist: > ------------------- > [Submitters: make sure that your review doesn't trigger any > checkmarks!] > > > Your checkin has not passed review because (see checked entries): > > ___ Your RR template is generally incomplete; it has too many blank entries > that need proper data filled in. > > ___ You have failed to nominate the proper persons for review and push. > > ___ Your patches do not have proper short+long header > > ___ You have grammar/spelling in your header that is unacceptable. > > ___ You have exceeded a sensible line length in your headers/comments/text. > > ___ You have failed to put in a proper Trac Ticket # into your commits. > > ___ You have incorrectly put/left internal data in your comments/files > (i.e. internal bug tracking tool IDs, product names etc) > > ___ You have not given any evidence of testing beyond basic build tests. > Demonstrate some level of runtime or other sanity testing. > > ___ You have ^M present in some of your files. These have to be removed. > > ___ You have needlessly changed whitespace or added whitespace crimes > like trailing spaces, or spaces before tabs. > > ___ You have mixed real technical changes with whitespace and other > cosmetic code cleanup changes. These have to be separate commits. > > ___ You need to refactor your submission into logical chunks; there is > too much content into a single commit. > > ___ You have extraneous garbage in your review (merge commits etc) > > ___ You have giant attachments which should never have been sent; > Instead you should place your content in a public tree to be pulled. > > ___ You have too many commits attached to an e-mail; resend as threaded > commits, or place in a public tree for a pull. > > ___ You have resent this content multiple times without a clear indication > of what has changed between each re-send. > > ___ You have failed to adequately and individually address all of the > comments and change requests that were proposed in the initial review. > > ___ You have a misconfigured ~/.hgrc file (i.e. username, email etc) > > ___ Your computer have a badly configured date and time; confusing the > the threaded patch review. > > ___ Your changes affect IPC mechanism, and you don't present any results > for in-service upgradability test. > > ___ Your changes affect user manual and documentation, your patch series > do not contain the patch that updates the Doxygen manual. > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ LIMITED TIME SALE - Full Year of Microsoft Training For Just $49.99! 1,500+ hours of tutorials including VisualStudio 2012, Windows 8, SharePoint 2013, SQL 2012, MVC 4, more. BEST VALUE: New Multi-Library Power Pack includes Mobile, Cloud, Java, and UX Design. Lowest price ever! Ends 9/20/13. http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=58041151&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ Opensaf-devel mailing list Opensaf-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensaf-devel
