Ack with comment. Please use NUM_FD instead of writing e.g. the number 5
directly in the code:
+static struct pollfd fds[5];
+static nfds_t nfds = 5;
replace with:
+static struct pollfd fds[NUM_FD];
+static nfds_t nfds = NUM_FD;
and:
+ while (osaf_poll(&sel[0], 3, -1) > 0) {
replace with:
+ while (osaf_poll(&sel[0], NUM_FD, -1) > 0) {
/ Anders Widell
2014-02-19 02:36, [email protected] skrev:
> Summary: use common sigterm handler [#512]
> Review request for Trac Ticket(s): #512
> Peer Reviewer(s): [email protected]
> Pull request to: <<LIST THE PERSON WITH PUSH ACCESS HERE>>
> Affected branch(es): 4.4.x, default
> Development branch: <<IF ANY GIVE THE REPO URL>>
>
> --------------------------------
> Impacted area Impact y/n
> --------------------------------
> Docs n
> Build system n
> RPM/packaging n
> Configuration files n
> Startup scripts n
> SAF services y
> OpenSAF services n
> Core libraries n
> Samples n
> Tests n
> Other n
>
>
> Comments (indicate scope for each "y" above):
> ---------------------------------------------
> All OpenSAF core services and CPD already install the
> common sigterm handler.
> This patch series takes a stab at the optional services.
> PLM is pending. Will send a separate patch for that.
>
> changeset ad694a098f13a829e051a196194b0da1bbac261d
> Author: Mathivanan N.P.<[email protected]>
> Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2014 20:28:26 -0500
>
> evt: use daemon_sigterm_install [#512] All core services and cpsv now
> register for a common sigterm handler. This patch series takes a stab
> at the
> optional services
>
> changeset 5d1b126dbf643b5c890d669a89069f296ea10046
> Author: Mathivanan N.P.<[email protected]>
> Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2014 20:30:16 -0500
>
> lck: gld to use daemon_sigterm_install [#512] All core services and
> cpsv now
> register for a common sigterm handler. This patch series takes a stab
> at the
> optional services
>
> changeset 9ff8677841414b28134e54be71f2bd795aeacf7a
> Author: Mathivanan N.P.<[email protected]>
> Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2014 20:31:03 -0500
>
> lck: glnd to use daemon_sigterm_install [#512] All core services and
> cpsv
> now register for a common sigterm handler. This patch series takes a
> stab at
> the optional services
>
> changeset f3715344e800a6449fddc22426284542dad87ccc
> Author: Mathivanan N.P.<[email protected]>
> Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2014 20:31:26 -0500
>
> msg: mqd to use daemon_sigterm_install [#512] All core services and
> cpsv now
> register for a common sigterm handler. This patch series takes a stab
> at the
> optional services
>
> changeset 7d94fd93c2c201fd5a10379af1d8fdefe28a0d8a
> Author: Mathivanan N.P.<[email protected]>
> Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2014 20:32:10 -0500
>
> msg: mqnd to use daemon_sigterm_install [#512] All core services and
> cpsv
> now register for a common sigterm handler. This patch series takes a
> stab at
> the optional services
>
>
> Complete diffstat:
> ------------------
> osaf/libs/common/edsv/include/eds.h | 2 ++
> osaf/libs/common/glsv/include/gld.h | 2 ++
> osaf/libs/common/glsv/include/glnd.h | 2 ++
> osaf/libs/common/mqsv/include/mqd.h | 2 ++
> osaf/libs/common/mqsv/include/mqnd.h | 2 ++
> osaf/services/saf/edsv/eds/eds_cb.c | 33
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
> osaf/services/saf/edsv/eds/eds_main.c | 1 -
> osaf/services/saf/glsv/gld/gld_api.c | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++++--------
> osaf/services/saf/glsv/gld/gld_main.c | 1 -
> osaf/services/saf/glsv/glnd/glnd_api.c | 15 +++++++++++++--
> osaf/services/saf/mqsv/mqd/mqd_api.c | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++------
> osaf/services/saf/mqsv/mqd/mqd_main.c | 1 -
> osaf/services/saf/mqsv/mqnd/mqnd_init.c | 31
> +++++++++++++++++++++++--------
> osaf/services/saf/mqsv/mqnd/mqnd_main.c | 1 -
> 14 files changed, 112 insertions(+), 37 deletions(-)
>
>
> Testing Commands:
> -----------------
> Upon /etc/init.d/opensafd stop,
> these optional services should print "exiting for shutdown" message
> in the syslog and without any core.
>
> performed repeatged swithcover, failover.
>
> Testing, Expected Results:
> --------------------------
>
> Upon /etc/init.d/opensafd stop,
> these optional services should print "exiting for shutdown" message
> in the syslog.
>
> Conditions of Submission:
> -------------------------
> Ack from Anders.
>
> Arch Built Started Linux distro
> -------------------------------------------
> mips n n
> mips64 n n
> x86 n n
> x86_64 y y
> powerpc n n
> powerpc64 n n
>
>
> Reviewer Checklist:
> -------------------
> [Submitters: make sure that your review doesn't trigger any checkmarks!]
>
>
> Your checkin has not passed review because (see checked entries):
>
> ___ Your RR template is generally incomplete; it has too many blank entries
> that need proper data filled in.
>
> ___ You have failed to nominate the proper persons for review and push.
>
> ___ Your patches do not have proper short+long header
>
> ___ You have grammar/spelling in your header that is unacceptable.
>
> ___ You have exceeded a sensible line length in your headers/comments/text.
>
> ___ You have failed to put in a proper Trac Ticket # into your commits.
>
> ___ You have incorrectly put/left internal data in your comments/files
> (i.e. internal bug tracking tool IDs, product names etc)
>
> ___ You have not given any evidence of testing beyond basic build tests.
> Demonstrate some level of runtime or other sanity testing.
>
> ___ You have ^M present in some of your files. These have to be removed.
>
> ___ You have needlessly changed whitespace or added whitespace crimes
> like trailing spaces, or spaces before tabs.
>
> ___ You have mixed real technical changes with whitespace and other
> cosmetic code cleanup changes. These have to be separate commits.
>
> ___ You need to refactor your submission into logical chunks; there is
> too much content into a single commit.
>
> ___ You have extraneous garbage in your review (merge commits etc)
>
> ___ You have giant attachments which should never have been sent;
> Instead you should place your content in a public tree to be pulled.
>
> ___ You have too many commits attached to an e-mail; resend as threaded
> commits, or place in a public tree for a pull.
>
> ___ You have resent this content multiple times without a clear indication
> of what has changed between each re-send.
>
> ___ You have failed to adequately and individually address all of the
> comments and change requests that were proposed in the initial review.
>
> ___ You have a misconfigured ~/.hgrc file (i.e. username, email etc)
>
> ___ Your computer have a badly configured date and time; confusing the
> the threaded patch review.
>
> ___ Your changes affect IPC mechanism, and you don't present any results
> for in-service upgradability test.
>
> ___ Your changes affect user manual and documentation, your patch series
> do not contain the patch that updates the Doxygen manual.
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Managing the Performance of Cloud-Based Applications
Take advantage of what the Cloud has to offer - Avoid Common Pitfalls.
Read the Whitepaper.
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=121054471&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
Opensaf-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensaf-devel
