Hi AndersBj,

The ticket is already pushed in 4.2.x stream.

/Neel.
On Tuesday 04 March 2014 02:13 PM, Anders Bjornerstedt wrote:
> Too late for the 4.2 patch.
>
> /AndersBj
>
> Neelakanta Reddy wrote:
>> Hi zoran,
>>
>> Reviewed the patches for 4.2.x, 4.3.x, 4.4.x(default).
>> Tested with 4.2.x .
>> Ack for all patches.
>>
>> /Neel.
>>
>>
>> On Friday 21 February 2014 10:07 PM, Zoran Milinkovic wrote:
>>> Summary: IMM: add support for forwards compatibility of attribute 
>>> flags [#116]
>>> Review request for Trac Ticket(s): 116
>>> Peer Reviewer(s): Neelakanta
>>> Pull request to: Zoran
>>> Affected branch(es): opensaf-4.2.x
>>> Development branch: opensaf-4.2.x
>>>
>>> --------------------------------
>>> Impacted area       Impact y/n
>>> --------------------------------
>>>   Docs                    n
>>>   Build system            n
>>>   RPM/packaging           n
>>>   Configuration files     n
>>>   Startup scripts         n
>>>   SAF services            y
>>>   OpenSAF services        n
>>>   Core libraries          n
>>>   Samples                 n
>>>   Tests                   n
>>>   Other                   n
>>>
>>>
>>> Comments (indicate scope for each "y" above):
>>> ---------------------------------------------
>>>
>>> changeset 5d03eb30ac8a399dfef00880331ac5673c5842ac
>>> Author:    Zoran Milinkovic <zoran.milinko...@ericsson.com>
>>> Date:    Fri, 21 Feb 2014 17:18:28 +0100
>>>
>>>     IMM: add support for forwards compatibility of attribute flags 
>>> [#116]
>>>
>>> changeset fa1c55912ed6115122be1960ad4d31631fe42de3
>>> Author:    Zoran Milinkovic <zoran.milinko...@ericsson.com>
>>> Date:    Fri, 21 Feb 2014 17:21:37 +0100
>>>
>>>     IMMTOOLS: add support for forwards compatibility of attribute 
>>> flags [#116]
>>>
>>>     For forwards compatibility, OpenSAF schema, where unknown 
>>> attribute flags
>>>     are defined, must be provided to immcfg using -X flag. If 
>>> immload finds
>>>     unknown attribute flag, immload will try to find the attribute 
>>> flag in the
>>>     schema defined in the top element of the loading IMM XML file.
>>>
>>>
>>> Complete diffstat:
>>> ------------------
>>>   osaf/services/saf/immsv/immnd/ImmModel.cc    |   39 
>>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
>>>   osaf/services/saf/immsv/immnd/ImmSearchOp.cc |    2 +-
>>>   osaf/services/saf/immsv/immnd/ImmSearchOp.hh |    4 +-
>>>   osaf/tools/safimm/immcfg/imm_cfg.c           |   31 
>>> ++++++++++++++++++++++-----
>>>   osaf/tools/safimm/immcfg/imm_import.cc       |  178 
>>> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
>>>   osaf/tools/safimm/immlist/imm_list.c         |    6 -----
>>>   osaf/tools/safimm/immload/imm_loader.cc      |  150 
>>> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
>>>   7 files changed, 368 insertions(+), 42 deletions(-)
>>>
>>>
>>> Testing Commands:
>>> -----------------
>>> immcfg -X schema_with_unknown_flags.xsd imm.xml
>>>
>>>
>>> Testing, Expected Results:
>>> --------------------------
>>> When OpenSAF starts without PBE enabled, immload must successfuly 
>>> load imm.xml with unknown flags, if unknown flags are defined in a 
>>> schema of loading imm.xml file. The schema must be in the same 
>>> directory as imm.xml.
>>>
>>>
>>> Conditions of Submission:
>>> -------------------------
>>> Ack from Neelakanta
>>>
>>>
>>> Arch      Built     Started    Linux distro
>>> -------------------------------------------
>>> mips        n          n
>>> mips64      n          n
>>> x86         n          n
>>> x86_64      n          n
>>> powerpc     n          n
>>> powerpc64   n          n
>>>
>>>
>>> Reviewer Checklist:
>>> -------------------
>>> [Submitters: make sure that your review doesn't trigger any 
>>> checkmarks!]
>>>
>>>
>>> Your checkin has not passed review because (see checked entries):
>>>
>>> ___ Your RR template is generally incomplete; it has too many blank 
>>> entries
>>>      that need proper data filled in.
>>>
>>> ___ You have failed to nominate the proper persons for review and push.
>>>
>>> ___ Your patches do not have proper short+long header
>>>
>>> ___ You have grammar/spelling in your header that is unacceptable.
>>>
>>> ___ You have exceeded a sensible line length in your 
>>> headers/comments/text.
>>>
>>> ___ You have failed to put in a proper Trac Ticket # into your commits.
>>>
>>> ___ You have incorrectly put/left internal data in your comments/files
>>>      (i.e. internal bug tracking tool IDs, product names etc)
>>>
>>> ___ You have not given any evidence of testing beyond basic build 
>>> tests.
>>>      Demonstrate some level of runtime or other sanity testing.
>>>
>>> ___ You have ^M present in some of your files. These have to be 
>>> removed.
>>>
>>> ___ You have needlessly changed whitespace or added whitespace crimes
>>>      like trailing spaces, or spaces before tabs.
>>>
>>> ___ You have mixed real technical changes with whitespace and other
>>>      cosmetic code cleanup changes. These have to be separate commits.
>>>
>>> ___ You need to refactor your submission into logical chunks; there is
>>>      too much content into a single commit.
>>>
>>> ___ You have extraneous garbage in your review (merge commits etc)
>>>
>>> ___ You have giant attachments which should never have been sent;
>>>      Instead you should place your content in a public tree to be 
>>> pulled.
>>>
>>> ___ You have too many commits attached to an e-mail; resend as threaded
>>>      commits, or place in a public tree for a pull.
>>>
>>> ___ You have resent this content multiple times without a clear 
>>> indication
>>>      of what has changed between each re-send.
>>>
>>> ___ You have failed to adequately and individually address all of the
>>>      comments and change requests that were proposed in the initial 
>>> review.
>>>
>>> ___ You have a misconfigured ~/.hgrc file (i.e. username, email etc)
>>>
>>> ___ Your computer have a badly configured date and time; confusing the
>>>      the threaded patch review.
>>>
>>> ___ Your changes affect IPC mechanism, and you don't present any 
>>> results
>>>      for in-service upgradability test.
>>>
>>> ___ Your changes affect user manual and documentation, your patch 
>>> series
>>>      do not contain the patch that updates the Doxygen manual.
>>>
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>  
>>
>> Flow-based real-time traffic analytics software. Cisco certified tool.
>> Monitor traffic, SLAs, QoS, Medianet, WAAS etc. with NetFlow Analyzer
>> Customize your own dashboards, set traffic alerts and generate reports.
>> Network behavioral analysis & security monitoring. All-in-one tool.
>> http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=126839071&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk 
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Opensaf-devel mailing list
>> Opensaf-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensaf-devel
>


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subversion Kills Productivity. Get off Subversion & Make the Move to Perforce.
With Perforce, you get hassle-free workflows. Merge that actually works. 
Faster operations. Version large binaries.  Built-in WAN optimization and the
freedom to use Git, Perforce or both. Make the move to Perforce.
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=122218951&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
Opensaf-devel mailing list
Opensaf-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensaf-devel

Reply via email to