Summary: clm: add new test case of API saClmInitialize() of apitest [#2914]
Review request for Ticket(s): 2914
Peer Reviewer(s):Anders, Hans, Ravi 
Pull request to: *** LIST THE PERSON WITH PUSH ACCESS HERE ***
Affected branch(es): develop
Development branch: ticket-2914
Base revision: f8a6848a1cdbff0b518c3db951e4689e260226c7
Personal repository: git://git.code.sf.net/u/mohan-hasoln/review

--------------------------------
Impacted area       Impact y/n
--------------------------------
 Docs                    n
 Build system            n
 RPM/packaging           n
 Configuration files     n
 Startup scripts         n
 SAF services            n
 OpenSAF services        n
 Core libraries          n
 Samples                 n
 Tests                   y
 Other                   n

NOTE: Patch(es) contain lines longer than 80 characers

Comments (indicate scope for each "y" above):
---------------------------------------------
*** EXPLAIN/COMMENT THE PATCH SERIES HERE ***

revision 7b500ebca4037bcf3d55a2112b7aa6cb31a1ac87
Author: Mohan Kanakam <[email protected]>
Date:   Tue, 6 Nov 2018 13:15:53 +0530

clm: add new test case of API saClmClusterTrackStop() of apitest [#2914]



revision 5265697c88e2821157b301dc26b064c9fa59480d
Author: Mohan Kanakam <[email protected]>
Date:   Tue, 6 Nov 2018 12:58:35 +0530

clm: add new test case of API saClmFinalize() of apitest [#2914]



revision 6201fde1f0528bfabc0fc999a056b4d97a3b88a8
Author: Mohan Kanakam <[email protected]>
Date:   Tue, 6 Nov 2018 12:54:04 +0530

clm: add new test case of API saClmDispatch() of apitest [#2914]



revision bd8b29be410502c4b579e391a1cb416c8cc3222a
Author: Mohan Kanakam <[email protected]>
Date:   Tue, 6 Nov 2018 12:22:51 +0530

clm: add new test case of API saClmSelectionObjectGet() of apitest [#2914]



revision 0202f49f5fff8601d86293c66e7bd816a1e556b8
Author: Mohan Kanakam <[email protected]>
Date:   Tue, 6 Nov 2018 12:15:27 +0530

clm: add new test case of API saClmInitialize() of apitest [#2914]



Complete diffstat:
------------------
 src/clm/apitest/tet_saClmClusterTrackStop.cc   |  21 +++++
 src/clm/apitest/tet_saClmDispatch.cc           | 110 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
 src/clm/apitest/tet_saClmFinalize.cc           |   6 ++
 src/clm/apitest/tet_saClmInitialize.cc         |  53 ++++++++++++
 src/clm/apitest/tet_saClmSelectionObjectGet.cc |   9 ++
 5 files changed, 199 insertions(+)


Testing Commands:
-----------------
./clmtest

Testing, Expected Results:
--------------------------
13  PASSED   saClmInitialize with multiple instance
14  PASSED   saClmInitialize_4 with clusterNodeGetCallback as null
15  PASSED   saClmInitialize_4 with all parameters as null
16  PASSED   saClmInitialize_4 with callback & version as null
17  PASSED   saClmInitialize_4 with handle & version as null
18  PASSED   saClmInitialize_4 with handle as null
19  PASSED   saClmInitialize_4 with handle & ClusterNodeGetCallback as null
5  PASSED   saClmSelectionObjectGet Fianlize Handle  SA_AIS_ERR_BAD_HANDLE
5  PASSED   saClmDispatch - invalid handle SA_DISPATCH_ONE SA_AIS_ERR_BAD_HANDLE
6  PASSED   saClmDispatch - invalid handle SA_DISPATCH_BLOCKING 
SA_AIS_ERR_BAD_HANDLE
7  PASSED   saClmDispatch - uninitilized handle SA_DISPATCH_ALL 
SA_AIS_ERR_BAD_HANDLE
8  PASSED   saClmDispatch - uninitilized handle SA_DISPATCH_ONE 
SA_AIS_ERR_BAD_HANDLE
9  PASSED   saClmDispatch - uninitilzed handle SA_DISPATCH_BLOCKING 
SA_AIS_ERR_BAD_HANDLE
10  PASSED   saClmDispatch - finalized handle SA_DISPATCH_ALL 
SA_AIS_ERR_BAD_HANDLE
11  PASSED   saClmDispatch - finalized handle SA_DISPATCH_ONE 
SA_AIS_ERR_BAD_HANDLE
12  PASSED   saClmDispatch - finalized handle SA_DISPATCH_BLOCKING 
SA_AIS_ERR_BAD_HANDLE
9  PASSED   saClmFinalize SA_AIS_ERR_BAD_HANDLE - uninitilzed handle
3  PASSED   saClmClusterTrackStop with finalized handle, SA_AIS_ERR_BAD_HANDLE


Conditions of Submission:
-------------------------
Ack from maintainers

Arch      Built     Started    Linux distro
-------------------------------------------
mips        n          n
mips64      n          n
x86         n          n
x86_64      y          y
powerpc     n          n
powerpc64   n          n


Reviewer Checklist:
-------------------
[Submitters: make sure that your review doesn't trigger any checkmarks!]


Your checkin has not passed review because (see checked entries):

___ Your RR template is generally incomplete; it has too many blank entries
    that need proper data filled in.

___ You have failed to nominate the proper persons for review and push.

___ Your patches do not have proper short+long header

___ You have grammar/spelling in your header that is unacceptable.

___ You have exceeded a sensible line length in your headers/comments/text.

___ You have failed to put in a proper Trac Ticket # into your commits.

___ You have incorrectly put/left internal data in your comments/files
    (i.e. internal bug tracking tool IDs, product names etc)

___ You have not given any evidence of testing beyond basic build tests.
    Demonstrate some level of runtime or other sanity testing.

___ You have ^M present in some of your files. These have to be removed.

___ You have needlessly changed whitespace or added whitespace crimes
    like trailing spaces, or spaces before tabs.

___ You have mixed real technical changes with whitespace and other
    cosmetic code cleanup changes. These have to be separate commits.

___ You need to refactor your submission into logical chunks; there is
    too much content into a single commit.

___ You have extraneous garbage in your review (merge commits etc)

___ You have giant attachments which should never have been sent;
    Instead you should place your content in a public tree to be pulled.

___ You have too many commits attached to an e-mail; resend as threaded
    commits, or place in a public tree for a pull.

___ You have resent this content multiple times without a clear indication
    of what has changed between each re-send.

___ You have failed to adequately and individually address all of the
    comments and change requests that were proposed in the initial review.

___ You have a misconfigured ~/.gitconfig file (i.e. user.name, user.email etc)

___ Your computer have a badly configured date and time; confusing the
    the threaded patch review.

___ Your changes affect IPC mechanism, and you don't present any results
    for in-service upgradability test.

___ Your changes affect user manual and documentation, your patch series
    do not contain the patch that updates the Doxygen manual.



_______________________________________________
Opensaf-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensaf-devel

Reply via email to