Alon Bar-Lev wrote: > On 2/8/07, Wolfgang Glas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Does anybody have a better idea, any arguments against this procedure? > > Well... I have my own copy at pkcs11-helper... > But I think it is best to have a simple "stupid" package and > dependency for all projects, so that this file will be usable by all > the open source community as a standalone package which installs it at > include directory.
This is also a feasible approach. Additionally it does not inhibit the usage of this header file through svn:external Wolfgang _______________________________________________ opensc-devel mailing list opensc-devel@lists.opensc-project.org http://www.opensc-project.org/mailman/listinfo/opensc-devel
