On 2/6/09, Andreas Jellinghaus <a...@dungeon.inka.de> wrote: > Am Freitag 06 Februar 2009 00:25:27 schrieb Alon Bar-Lev: > > > The above is what I requested. I write the new framework using a goal > > we agree upon, and if I achieve those goals, we mark pcsc-lite and > > OpenCT as obsolete and continue this road. > > > this is unreasonable. noone discards a well working software (even with > several minor issues), before something new has been shown to work > better.
Do you even read what I write? *IF* and only *IF* we achieve the *GOALS* we *AGREE* then and *ONLY* then we mark older frameworks obsolete. Do you claim people cannot plan? And forced to keep on going always in the same direction? Why agree into using electrical cars? The oil ones works just great. Can't we plan the transition between oil cars to electric ones and say that if all goes as planned in 2030 there will be only electric cards around? I think we can... People had shown many times in past that the can plan ahead. Alon. _______________________________________________ opensc-devel mailing list opensc-devel@lists.opensc-project.org http://www.opensc-project.org/mailman/listinfo/opensc-devel
