Hi, On Samstag, 7. Februar 2009, Ludovic Rousseau wrote: [...] > That is why I propose to call it pcsc-lite v2.0 and propose to use the > same hosting service as pcsc-lite (alioth). [...]
I don't think pcsclite v2.0 really describes what Alon is trying to create: If I understood correctly he wants to create a new layer *below* the then new pcsclite (so that pcsclite 2.0 will be just another client to Alon's framework). [...] > Do we have to split libscreader and pcsc-screader? > If we do then we will have to keep the interface between them stable. [...] But that's the point, isn't it? If the new framework is to be used by OpenCT, PC/SC and possibly other frameworks the API *needs* to be somewhat stable... As far as I know from reading the postings on this list the new framework isn't going to be an internal interface of libpcsclite but rather a framework for at least 3 existing APIs. [...] > If it is the same project we can easily change the interface since > that would be an internal interface (with no stability guarantee and > then more freeness). [...] That kinda defeats the idea of an API to be used also by other projects... Regards Martin -- "Things are only impossible until they're not" Martin Preuss - http://www2.aquamaniac.de/ AqBanking - http://www.aqbanking.de/ LibChipcard - http://www.libchipcard.de/ _______________________________________________ opensc-devel mailing list opensc-devel@lists.opensc-project.org http://www.opensc-project.org/mailman/listinfo/opensc-devel
