If using PKCS#11 I would personally not go down a path that is not 
commonly used. The common usage of smart cards and hardware security 
modules always stores both the private (as a sensitive object) and the 
public key (either as a public key or as an x.509 certificate).
This works and is well tested and is sure to work across a wide range of 
smart cards and hardware security modules.

Why is this not suitable for OpenDNSSEC.

Cheers,
Tomas

On 03/16/2010 01:40 PM, Rickard Bellgrim wrote:
>
> On 16 mar 2010, at 09.15, Andreas Jellinghaus wrote:
>
>> Am Dienstag 16 März 2010 08:28:32 schrieb Rickard Bellgrim:
>>> But you still have access to the "public parts" of the private key.
>>
>> ok, I'm no expert here, so I can't say yes or know.
>>
>> But I know that some cards hide their private keys, so you need
>> to login first, to see if some private key is on the card.
>
> I read some more in the PKCS#11 specification, and it actually says that only 
> the CKA_MODULUS and CKA_PRIVATE_EXPONENT is required to be stored by the 
> token. It is then up to the token if it wants to store the other attributes 
> of the private key object.
>
> You need CKA_MODULUS and CKA_PUBLIC_EXPONENT in order to create a public key 
> from the data in the private key. You can access these attributes if:
> - The private key object is public.
> - If the object is private, then the user needs to be logged in.
> - And the token needs to store the attributes.
>
> OpenDNSSEC always login into the token, so that is no problem. But the 
> conclusion is that you cannot guarantee that the CKA_PUBLIC_EXPONENT of the 
> private key object is available.
>
> Is there any implementation that does not store the CKA_PUBLIC_EXPONENT?
>
> If so, then it clearly is a need of the public key object. The key might not 
> be generated on the same machine as it is used.
>
> Or another solution is that the application also writes the public key to 
> disc, when it is still available. And then you make sure that you have your 
> private key on a smartcard and the public key written on a paper.
>
> // Rickard
> _______________________________________________
> opensc-devel mailing list
> opensc-devel@lists.opensc-project.org
> http://www.opensc-project.org/mailman/listinfo/opensc-devel

_______________________________________________
opensc-devel mailing list
opensc-devel@lists.opensc-project.org
http://www.opensc-project.org/mailman/listinfo/opensc-devel

Reply via email to