On May 10, 2011, at 15:38 , Alon Bar-Lev wrote: > On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 1:18 PM, Giuliano Bertoletti <g...@symbolic.it> wrote: >> I pointed out the slot_id matter instead because it is just wrong to start >> from the assumption that the user knows it and it won't change between >> multiple executions. > > Same for index. > Sorry, I still cannot see your point. > Had you argued that you wish to use slot description I would have understood. > However, both id and index are generated at runtime and can change at > any point in time.
>From practical experience, ID *should* be treated as opaque whereas index >offset could be more predictable (as is the case with nCipher, probably others >have similar glitches). While both are "inherently wrong" they are seen in the >wild. -- @MartinPaljak.net +3725156495 _______________________________________________ opensc-devel mailing list opensc-devel@lists.opensc-project.org http://www.opensc-project.org/mailman/listinfo/opensc-devel
