On 2012-09-05 13:29, helpcrypto helpcrypto wrote: >> Huh, I'd guess (hope) nobody would be deploying *RSA* below 2048 bits >> (smart cards doing 3k and 4k are also slowly emerging) and elliptic >> curves are already becoming a viable option (in commodity software) as >> well.. > > The most advanced i have seen here so far is 2048 :P > >> There's also a bunch of applications and use cases where the new age >> vision of "wave your phone around" is not a good idea (for example I'd >> better avoid taking my smartphone out unless I want/have to, and using >> crowded public transport is not one of the places I'd like to do >> it...) >> >> And IMHO device-attached containers (TPM, Intel etc) are totally >> different from transportable key-containers (like smart cards or USB >> tokens) > > So, IYHO, whats the better option?
As I wrote, the majority of eIDs will be used as secure bootstrap of credential clones so there really is no option here although BSI probably claims something else. Anders > _______________________________________________ > opensc-devel mailing list > opensc-devel@lists.opensc-project.org > http://www.opensc-project.org/mailman/listinfo/opensc-devel > _______________________________________________ opensc-devel mailing list opensc-devel@lists.opensc-project.org http://www.opensc-project.org/mailman/listinfo/opensc-devel
