Allen Bierbaum skrev: > It looks like the Future of OpenSG discussions have settled down out a > bit. It think it is time to try to sift through the discussion and try > to come up with a summary and some plans for the future.
[snip] Great work Allen! Just two issues spring to mind before I start diving into this: - What is the preffered format for discussing things on the wiki? Starting a ticket (sort of like a forum thread) or opening a separate page per issue where users could add comments (like the c2-wiki)? (Or, in a larger sense, how should we manage this entire process?) - the ProjectIdeas page's content was made up of my list of things I actually have developed. I've edited that a bit to make that clear, but the list I have (and I assume other people also have tidbits they could share) should probably go somewhere else. I think that there is some merit to having a page where users (or rather would-be-contributors) could list what functionality they have developed and could imagine sharing. (Can't think of a good name for this at the moment though.) Cheers, /Marcus ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ Opensg-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensg-users
