Yes I understand. That's why I said its no less secure than the protocol it's based on. And Diva I get that the external asset server is very configurable. I don't expect changes. I just don't believe HyperGrid as its designed is correct or allows for the management of relationships. It would need to be able to allow the establishing of trust between both users and grids and services and grids as well as users and services. And that would need to be exposed at user level. I should be able to say I don't trust service X as a user. Or don't give me anything from Grid Y. Same with grid to grid/service. That's partially there.
I never believed that hypergrid belonged in core. I said so at the time. But its there now so we live with it. It would be nice if really this was all looked at with fresh eyes. But I don't expect that will happen at this stage either. Mike -----Original Message----- From: opensim-dev-boun...@lists.berlios.de [mailto:opensim-dev-boun...@lists.berlios.de] On Behalf Of Oren Hurvitz Sent: Sunday, March 30, 2014 11:39 AM To: opensim-dev@lists.berlios.de Subject: Re: [Opensim-dev] Optimize pushing assets to other grids It's already possible to know which assets are on the server by performing GETs, so this method doesn't change the security situation. -- View this message in context: http://opensim-dev.2196679.n2.nabble.com/Optimize-pushing-assets-to-other-gr ids-tp7579093p7579096.html Sent from the opensim-dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ Opensim-dev mailing list Opensim-dev@lists.berlios.de https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/opensim-dev _______________________________________________ Opensim-dev mailing list Opensim-dev@lists.berlios.de https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/opensim-dev