This begins to sound a lot like 'verse'. -Kyle H
On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 1:55 AM, Toni Alatalo <[email protected]> wrote: > On May 25, 2009, at 3:07 AM, Ethan Grammatikidis wrote: >> The problem is not the absence of clever code but rather that the >> protocol has never offered more than a bare minimum of interactivity; >> just toy interactivity really. As long as OpenSim tries to accomodate >> all viewers that will continue to be the case. > > I don't think that is true: AFAIK OpenSim supports multiple kinds of > clients by enabling you to have different code to handle different kind > of connections. Isn't it so that for example the MXP client view works > so that that protocol is used for those clients, and SL for the > slviewer, and both kinds can be connected to the same sim at the same > time? > > So you can add a new protocol to OpenSim and support any features > there, and others can still use other client apps to connect, just > won't have those features enabled. For example they could perhaps see a > web page that updates sometimes, and you would have some advanced means > to interact with it. > > ~Toni > > _______________________________________________ > Opensim-users mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/opensim-users > _______________________________________________ Opensim-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/opensim-users
