I agree with Justin about a big difference being to persistent metaverse and longer term social dynamics, formation of identity etc. I suspect that many educational uses think in one off terms eg a collaborative class in business collaboration even if there is concern about reuse of assets o reusable learning objects etc. Not the development of university, school or wider social network. Most Unity examples are one off uses eg teach sensitive sex education, help the emergency services learn to communicate etc. rather than an ongoing world of Warcraft scenario.
So one question is what is OpenSim used for? It is also a fact that OpenSim is tightly coupled with Second a Life, and this is not unsurprising given its heritage and the vast, in comparison, user base there and technical advice. There is of course the very tight link in terms of viewer technology. It was this link that, in part, made me choose OpenSim over Wonderland for instance. Whilst I predominately use OpenSim now it is not on social grounds but as a platform. People do not want to use metaverses on the scale of other social media ( viewing opensim as a social platform) or remote communication platform e.g. Skype meetings rather than OpenSim meetings. I once suggested a meeting in SL - might as well of mentioned someone has BO; move on quickly. OpenSim also shares a lot with virtual reality platforms - I do hate that term e.g. CAVE which like Unity tends to have a one off. The Rift is narrowing the gap, and OpenSim/SL has been displayed in CAVE environments. Technologies such as the Oculus Rift and other potential haptic technologies may have a impact. I had to halt my experiments for a while as Cybersickness on the DevKit1 caused problems. Still the Rift did score highly on presence questionnaires despite this, although the questionnaires are only a part of the presence story. The move to using multiple platforms, augmented reality is a challenge. In a social environment I want to communicate wherever I go. I am tapping away on my iPad, checked my emails on the phone and soon will start using my laptop. Is it time to pull together these strands about what will make a better OpenSim? I am not just talking about the technological issues, although these and the formats are vital but also aspects relating to human factors, presence, emotion, collaboration theory and of course standards formats as well as it's uses above? OpenSim does have a divide between the platform and viewer yet setting aside client/server and technical issues they are intimately coupled as one. Oh if anyone knows has a financial viability/funding wand please let me know ;) Tom Willans BSc(Hons) MBCS CITP PhD Student Serious Games Institute, Coventry University United Kingdom Managing Director Bessacarr Publications Ltd +44 (0)121 288 0281 email: tom.will...@bessacarr.com skype: tom.willans Second Life and OSGrid: Tom Tiros Sent from my iPad > On 22 Jul 2014, at 00:48, Justin Clark-Casey <jjusti...@googlemail.com> wrote: > > I think that OpenSimulator and Unity have some overlap but not by a huge > amount. > > My perspective is that the focus of Unity is very much on game development. > It gives you a good and flexible set of tools but you need to do a fair > amount of work to plug them together or extend them to create a high fidelity > (ha) product. The focus is on creating a one-off experience, though the > lines are blurring now that some games (e.g. Minecraft, DOTA2) are very long > lived and keep receiving updates. The experiences are high quality because > they are quite tightly controlled. High multi-user (let alone massive > multi-user) has not been a focus area because this stuff is *hard* and > nowadays not obviously a winning formula for gamers. > > For OpenSimulator, the focus and much of the raison d'etre is the unified and > persistent virtual world. Thus, it gives you a high level set of tools which > are much less flexible (inventory, attachments, linksets, etc.) but because > everyone has them it allows collaboration and content reuse at a high level > (e.g. scripted objects, OARs). Some games blur into this (Minecraft, etc.). > It's a free-form environment so there's a high degree of freedom but a lot > that can go wrong (analogous to open-world jank) [1]. I see it as more > web-like because the same high-level software is evolved over time with the > hosted content changing. > > Moreover, there's a very high social focus through time. Because the same > high-level concepts are shared, there's more scope for network effects (esp. > with the Hypergrid) but the technological base is much more primitive and > relatively unexplored. > > So whilst I think Unity makes sense in many use cases, OpenSimulator is > ultimately much more interesting to me (unsurprisingly) because it gives a > glimpse into something radically new, a distributed, anarchic and evolving > Metaverse rather than a single vendor game. > > I think there is vast scope for the OpenSimulator ecosystem to continue to > evolve with features such as template objects, multi-level linksets, more > intuitive viewers and to adapt to technological evolution as embodied by new > hardware such as the Oculus Rift. Because it's open-source, innovation can > happen anywhere and without a single company's permission. I believe the > critical thing is that we arrive at protocols and formats that allow > evolution by disconnected parties whilst still inter-operating with the > existing system. Again, it's a comparison with a web ecosystem that has > extensible formats such as HTTP and HTML (insert a tag that a browser doesn't > understand and it doesn't (usually) stop your whole page from rendering). > > However, arriving at these formats and solving other hard fundamental > problems takes an enormous amount of time and effort, not only through > writing code but also in discussion and co-operation between parties with > different interests. My hope has always been that the platform will become > interesting enough to attract the critical mass of academics, enthusiasts and > entrepreneurs who can generate the time and funding required. To some extent > this happened but not enough (as of yet) to win any significant attention > outside of this niche. > > [1] http://www.giantbomb.com/open-world/3015-207/ > >> On 21/07/14 16:43, Wade wrote: >> This discussion has been the most enlightening I've seen in a long time! >> Thank you everyone! >> >> My experience agrees that faculty don't generally want to learn 3D content >> creation. >> >> Students are an interesting mix, and in high-stress programs also have very >> little tolerance or capacity for steep >> learning curves. >> === >> *On simplicity * >> >> In terms of students building things that didn't exist, maybe there is a >> game-principle based sweet-spot, because >> it's clear from the numbers that tens of millions of people spend tens or >> hundreds of hours with Minecraft. >> >> That suggest to me that students would love to co-create cool stuff, but the >> interface for doing so needs to have an >> extremely extremely simple /*starter subset*/. I say "starter", because >> gaming-principles also show that people who >> stick around and pay for worlds like World of Warcraft*_like challenges_*, >> or "unnecessary difficulties" as Jane >> McGonigal's "/*Reality is Broken*/ - why Games make us Better and How they >> can Change the World" book explains so well. >> (Imagine the interest in golf if the average length from tee to hole was ten >> feet, in a straight line, on a flat course, >> and the hole was ten feet across.) This is a great book, by the way, and >> very eye opening and challenging a lot of >> misunderstood concepts about "games", the nature and type of feedback that >> works, and why so many people voluntarily >> spend so much time on them, that is directly applicable to building any >> learning environment. >> >> For experienced builders (or those past their anxiety - resistance stage), >> yeah, prefabs in Unity are great! >> >> What is even better is that in Unity you CAN build/*hierarchical objects,*/ >> then mix and match the parts. In OpenSim >> and Second LIfe, once you put the wheels on the car and make a link-set, >> all traces of "wheel" are gone, and it >> becomes absurdly difficult to go back and put different wheels on the car if >> each wheel has 47 parts like spokes or >> lugnuts. You can approximate some of that capacity with "Builder's >> Buddy" or other tools that let you rez an entire >> multiobject scene with one click, but those are a true pain to load and >> maintain. >> >> So, whether it's Unity or OpenSim, I think one thing that is needed that >> is very hard to still see for Virtual reality >> natives is exactly HOW SIMPLE the INITIAL interface has to be, so that it is >> satisfying and rewarding to try to use for >> a terrified newbie, peeking though the fingers of the hands over the eyes. >> So simple in fact that even a faculty >> member might say "Oh heck, even I can do THAT!". >> >> === >> *On "weakest links" in collaborative environments* >> >> And both faculty and students are greatly upset by technological failure >> where they are used to trivial behavior, such >> as having voice working. The collaborative environment is much harsher >> than individual user environment since for >> voice (or many other things) to actually be useful, it has to work for >> EVERYONE, not just most people. >> >> This is a feature of collaborative environments that I didn't realize till >> Gary Olsen pointed it out. A collaborative >> environment can become a "weakest link" exposer, where everyone's experience >> is limited by the least capable user. >> This is one of the issues with, say, Electronic Health Records systems that >> is underappreciated and distinguishes it >> from, say, a cloud-based spreadsheet. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Opensim-users mailing list >> Opensim-users@opensimulator.org >> http://opensimulator.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/opensim-users > > > -- > Justin Clark-Casey (justincc) > OSVW Consulting > http://justincc.org > http://twitter.com/justincc > _______________________________________________ > Opensim-users mailing list > Opensim-users@opensimulator.org > http://opensimulator.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/opensim-users _______________________________________________ Opensim-users mailing list Opensim-users@opensimulator.org http://opensimulator.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/opensim-users
