IANAG (I am not a Googler) but, as I understand it, whether or not
url type gadgets will be supported in OpenSocial is still to be
determined.
(Dan)
On Nov 10, 2007, at 4:22 AM, siegi wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I have seen that there is an article in the issue list concerning this
> type.
> However from my developer perspective I would prefer this type for any
> "bigger" or more complex application and for turning an existing
> application into a gadget (as Google depicts this in the Gadgets
> documentation) - So why isn't this type the #1 implementation for
> Orkut Gadgets?
> Any developer could build a workaround and encapsulate the content and
> behavior into a dynamically generated Javascript and encapsulate the
> logic within the generated Javascript. But why should this be
> necessary?
>
> Any thoughts welcome.
>
> Btw. does anybody know when this type will be supported on Orkut or
> any other opensocial implementation, may be Hi5 is quicker in getting
> it included?
>
> Tanks!
>
>
> >
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"OpenSocial Developers" group.
To post to this group, send email to opensocial-api@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/opensocial-api?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
