Gary Helmling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Fri, 9 Nov 2007 09:37:48 >Daniel is quite right though that everyone will be free to ignore your >extension, or standardize on a different, incompatible version. We >really need a governance model defined for how the spec evolves.
>http://groups.google.com/group/opensocial-api/web/opensocial-standards >Seems like a good place to start a list of xml extensions. Yes, yes and yes. The problem is the GData person definition is really thin. I'd strongly recommend 1) Using existing standards wherever possible. I figure pretty much every implementation should include foaf and vcard. 2) Especially include things that are likely to be uniquely identifying properties like foaf:mbox_sha1sum 3) Talk about things that look like they're going to be common across multiple sites. let's try to make the effort to work co-operatively. -- Julian Bond E&MSN: julian_bond at voidstar.com M: +44 (0)77 5907 2173 Webmaster: http://www.ecademy.com/ T: +44 (0)192 0412 433 Personal WebLog: http://www.voidstar.com/ skype:julian.bond?chat *** Just Say No To DRM *** --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "OpenSocial Container Developers" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/opensocial-container?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
