On Mon, Nov 10, 2008 at 04:54:19PM +0300, Alexandre (Shura) Iline wrote: > jhf-1 > Section 2.2 describes the release binding for the project. The answer to the > question states that eclipse it is a Major release. Is that correct? > > Yes > > What is the delivery mechanism for this project? > > Through download page http://www.eclipse.org/downloads/ or through OS > packaging systems (similar to IPS). > > Is it a Minor release of Solaris? > > I do not understand this question.
I've found it's always safest to say "Minor", unless you do understand the question. Solaris 9, Solaris 10, Solaris-whatever-comes-next -- those are all "minor" releases. And all questions of "release binding" are with respect to Solaris releases. I have no idea how "major" could ever be used. Now I'm sure the finer points will be explained to us... > jhf-4 > > Both, although SVR4 package name should not manifest itself through IPS, as I > understand it. I think he means your package names should be SUNWeclipse and SUNWeclipse-root (or SUNWeclipseu and SUNWeclipser), rather than simply 'eclipse'. > mhm-1 > > I am not sure what "consolidation" means. He's asking, where do you plan to check-in this code? Are you planning to check this into ON, SFW, Desktop....? > mhm-3 > > As I can see, many packages are named like this, including netbeans: > http://pkg.opensolaris.org I've answered that above, but you also reference a package called 'j6dev'. A closer inspection of pkg.opensolaris.org shows that package is SUNWj6dev, not j6dev. Dean
