On Monday 10 November 2008 19:18:16 John Fischer wrote:
> Shura,
>
> Thanks for responding to the issues list.  I haven't
> digested all the answers to my issues yet.  I'll run
> through the answers again and get back to you.
>
> A couple of things jump out at me from the package map...
> First, the installation uses dot directories to hide things.
> Is this a result of how eclipse installs on other platforms
> or is this something that this project is introducing?

The first. This is how Eclipse does it. I have the same layout on Ubuntu.

> Second, the installation uses a temporary directory called
> tmp.  Is this the result of how eclipse installs on other
> platforms or or is this something that this project is
> introducing?

This is my error - thank you for pointing out.

I took a pkgmap from an experimental build. My apologies.

Please ignore this - the tmp dir does not exist in real one.

Shura.

>
> Thanks,
>
> John
>
> On Mon, 2008-11-10 at 05:54, Alexandre (Shura) Iline wrote:
> > LSARC member,
> >
> > Here are the answers for the issues:
> >
> >
> > jhf-0
> > Eclipse for Java Developers
> >
> > jhf-1
> > Section 2.2 describes the release binding for the project.  The answer to
> > the question states that eclipse it is a Major release.  Is that correct?
> >
> > Yes
> >
> > What is the delivery mechanism for this project?
> >
> > Through download page http://www.eclipse.org/downloads/ or through OS
> > packaging systems (similar to IPS).
> >
> > Is it a Minor release of Solaris?
> >
> > I do not understand this question.
> >
> > jhf-2
> >
> > Yes.
> >
> > jhf-3
> >
> > Yes, plenty. The pkg map is attached.
> >
> > jhf-4
> >
> > Both, although SVR4 package name should not manifest itself through IPS,
> > as I understand it.
> >
> > jhf-5
> >
> > Installed JDK - this is mentioned in the interface table.
> >
> > mhm-1
> >
> > I am not sure what "consolidation" means.
> >
> > mhm-2
> >
> > Java SDK environment vesion 6.
> > j6dev as opposed to j6re (runtime environment), I assume.
> >
> > mhm-3
> >
> > As I can see, many packages are named like this, including netbeans:
> > http://pkg.opensolaris.org
> >
> > mhm-4
> >
> > There is no man page if you install it from Eclipse download site. Ubuntu
> > distribution provides one (attached).
> >
> > tdc00
> >
> > It is port which is made available.
> >
> > tdc01
> >
> > Eclipse for Java Developers, according to
> > http://www.eclipse.org/downloads/
> >
> > tdc02
> >
> > We are working with the team which delivered SWT to Solaris.
> >
> > tdc03
> >
> > It is not pure Java - it has SWT and launcher which is not Java. No known
> > issues with 64-bit architecture.
> >
> > tdc04
> >
> > There is an auto-update functionality. Expect a separate note on this.
> >
> > tdc05
> >
> > There is no CLI in an IDE other than some auxiliary tools. IDE is a UI.
> >
> > tdc06
> >
> > The latest available - there is no specific version requirement.
> >
> > tdc07
> >
> > GTK is The GNOME Toolkit (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gtk)
> >
> > tdc08
> >
> > We will update the packages after new major releases go out.
> > See a separate note on autoupdate.
> >
> > jhf-6
> >
> > attached
> >
> > jhf-7, jhf-8
> >
> > We're working with the correspondent team.
> >
> > jhf-9
> >
> > This may require changes in Eclipse source code. We want to minimize it.
> > It is done the same on Ubuntu.
> >
> > jhf-9
> >
> > Submitted already
> >
> >
> > jhf-10
> >
> > See additional info on password storage.
> >
> > mm0
> >
> > Yes that was a mistake. Fixed already.
> >
> > mm1
> >
> > We were told we have to package SWT separately or use the existing one.
> > We're working on this.
> >
> > mm99
> >
> > Eclipse For Java Developer
> >
> > mm98
> >
> > See a separate note on update functionality.
> >
> > Shura.



Reply via email to