Edward Pilatowicz wrote: > ... a bunch of good stuff, including: > hence, i think it would be benificial to have projects answer the > following questions wrt zones integration: > > * is the functionality delivered by this project accessible, by default, > directly from within non-global zones? > > * is any configuration, state, and/or statistics used by this project > maintained on a per-zone basis? Do any tools for accessing this > information allow for per-zone views of this data? > > * does any functionality deliverd by this project expose information > about the global zone (or other non-global zones) to a non-global zone?
Might I suggest that instead of adding bulk back to the 20Qs, that you or the zones team come up with some sort of "design pattern for Zones", "zones howto/bestpractice" or similar that encompasses both these sorts of questions as well as the "answers" that are expected to go along with them? For instance, what does it mean (in terms of what I need to do in my project) to be "accessible, by default, directly from within non-global zones"? etc etc etc -John
