John Plocher wrote:
> Bart Smaalders wrote:
>> John Plocher wrote:
>>> Garrett D'Amore wrote:
>>>> This should be in a document tree that is referenced by this 20Q.
>>>
>>> Like the ARC Policy and Best Practices repository?
>>>
>>> Maybe an explicit reference would be good: "Please provide detailed
>>> rationale for any ARC Policies and/or BPs you don't adhere to".
>>>
That's a good idea, but my past experience (on ONSC and the ON C-team)
shows that it's not sufficient by itself. You don't want to list the
individual policies on the checklist if they are going to change
frequently, but you still have to spot-check the answer. When you do, it
often produces an exchange like this:
Q: Do you comply with all of the policies listed at [URL]?
A: Yes.
Q: Really? Does this project really comply with the [foo] policy?
A: I think so. Umm, I'll check and get back to you.
Q: What about the [bar] policy?
A: What's the [bar] policy?
...
Scott
