James Carlson wrote:
> Garrett D'Amore writes:
>
>> It is indeed derailed.
>>
>> What's the status after derailing? waiting need spec? waiting need
>> meeting?
>>
>
> Using "waiting need spec" is traditional, assuming no other
> information. The project team should be notified that the way forward
> is to send mail to psarc-agenda at sac.sfbay to request a specific date
> for review. At that point it becomes either "inception scheduled" or
> "commitment scheduled", depending on the materials and your level of
> optimism.
>
> It should not be left as "waiting fast-track", as that implies that
> the timer is still running, and the case could be approved.
>
>
Okay, I've fixed the IAM file. I'll probably wind up being the case
owner on this, but I've left it to Jim Walker for now.
Helen, do you understand what you need to do next?
- Garrett
