On Tue, 2009-06-09 at 22:52 -0700, Garrett D'Amore wrote: > For marketing purposes, a specially hacked driver, or a private tunable, > are adequate. We don't need to pollute our framework for this, nor > should we confuse administrators by presenting something to them that > they shouldn't be tuning. > > Solaris suffers from ETOOMANYTUNABLES. Canonizing more of them is not > the right way forward.
I've placed this case in waiting-need-spec while the project team works out how they'll proceed with addressing these concerns. The feedback so far has been in favor of a private property. I'll talk with the project team about going in that direction. -Seb
