On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 10:29 PM, Garrett D'Amore <gdamore at sun.com> wrote: > However, I have some reservations about this change for Solaris 10.
I understood Jerry's comment... Jerry Gilliam wrote: > For the minor (major?) release only, I think it would be reasonable to > modify iostat(1M) to -n behavior by default, effectively obsoleting > -n and the <driver><instance> form of device name reporting. ... to say that the iostat and vmstat and friends would not change their default in Solaris10 (which would be the "patch binding" part of the effort), but that they could/would in OpenSolaris/Solaris.next (the minor/major? binding). -John
