Garrett D'Amore wrote: >> >> I think that was too quick :) The i-team might well agree to patch >> disktype to use libfstyp as a source of information... I've asked for >> that, now let's give them a chance to tell us if they're willing to do >> that :) >> > > Please go back and reread my last statement. If they use libfstyp, then > yes, I'll rescind the derailment. (Or if they figure out another way > to support ZFS.) Without ZFS support, the derailment stands, and I'll > actually vote to deny this case if it comes up for a vote as currently > specified.
The project team was already planning to extend disktype to support zfs and work is in progress, but they also saw utility in making disktype available prior to the changes. I'll get them to provide more details on where they are at including incorporating the suggestions by Nico. Cheers, Jim
