James Carlson wrote:
> Garrett D'Amore wrote:
>> James Carlson wrote:
>>> Garrett D'Amore wrote:
>>>> This case had an inception review 3/14/2007, and has not been back
>>>> for commitment. Can someone clarify the relationship of this case
>>>> with 2008/532? Is this case (2007/132) just an umbrella? Or is it
>>>> superseded by 2008/532? Or will the project team at some point be
>>>> coming back for a commitment on 2007/132?
>>>
>>> I seem to recall that we handled this one during ARC business. Scan
>>> through /shared/sac/PSARC/Minutes/200[78]/.
>> I didn't see anything in the archives, except for the notes during
>> the commitment.
>
> OK. A quick discussion during ARC business is all that I recall for
> this one. I think there was some confusion over it, as it was filed
> as a one-pager, intended to be a fast-track, but then seen to be too
> large to be a fast-track.
>
> In any event, it's mostly dead. The original NWAM design was just a
> prototype. It was updated quite a bit (in architectural detail) by
> Phase 0.5. And then much of that design was later junked in the Phase
> 1 project. I think that's getting closer to integration, so the value
> of the original Phase 0 work is quickly approaching nil.
So maybe we should just declare this one superseded?
- Garrett
