Alan Perry wrote: > Garrett D'Amore wrote: >> This is not the only criteria for self-review. Self-review cases must >> also be so obvious and self explanatory that no further review is >> desired or required. They should usually should not be introducing >> new architecture. >> >> I believe this case exceed this threshold, and I would like to make >> sure it is properly reviewed. Please convert this to a fast track with >> a one week timer. > > This case does not introduce new architecture. It is making changes to > an architecture introduced in PSARC/2004/779. > > As far as the obvious criteria, obvious to whom?
Obvious to the reviewers -- in this case, that would be those on psarc-ext, such as Garrett. I think his response was completely appropriate. It wasn't in any way a denial of anything the project team has done; it was simply a request to have a couple of days to look the materials over before declaring the ARC review of the change to be complete. Reviews outside of the ARC are a great thing, and it's good to know that the project team has sought such reviews, and that there are willing people with domain expertise available to provide them. They're never a substitute for open ARC review, though.
