John Plocher wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 10:17 AM, Alan Perry<Alan.Perry at sun.com> wrote:
>> However, I am concerned about inconsistent application of the documented
>> process.
>
> In the past, my decision tree looked like this:
>
> Proposed stability level for new interfaces:
>
> {Project Private, Not an Interface} ) => Self Review
> {Consolidation Private} => Fast Track
> {Sun Private} => Deny with extreme prejudice :-)
>
> else
>
> => Fasttrack or full case, as circumstances require, based on
> whether incompatible changes are being made to interfaces
> that have existing expectations of longevity...
That sounds reasonable.
However, as I have noted, in the past I have sponsored cases with more
significant changes where PSARC members said "why is this a fast-track
and not a self-review".
I like your decision tree, but it isn't what everyone does and it
doesn't completely map to the documented process.
alan
