On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 08:36:25PM -0700, Garrett D'Amore wrote: > Danek Duvall wrote: > >On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 07:43:41PM -0700, Garrett D'Amore wrote: > > > >>Understood. And I'm happy with that. Lets put the save files as a > >>Volatile interface, or even Not-An-Interface, then. Agree? > > > >They sound Project Private to me -- worth documenting, but not necessarily > >compatible between versions of fakeroot. Sort of like ZFS streams in that > >way. > > Okay. I wasn't sure about the semantics... the contents can be > project private, but their existence is something higher?
The save files themselves are created on behalf of the user at a user-given location. I wouldn't consider their existence or anything about their location an interface. The only Public interface involved are the -s and -i options, which presumably fall under the generic "Uncommitted" classification that fakeroot itself does. Danek
