Darren, I see that this case is "waiting need vote". I hadn't seen a draft opinion, and thought that I had at least asked for one. The discussion between myself and Alan seemed to clarify that this interface would only exist in Solaris 10, with a new interface using PSARC/2007/315 interface framework...in OpenSolaris and Nevada. Does that satisfy the advise which caused you to derail? Just wondering if how this case moves forward. -- Rick
On 07/ 9/09 04:33 AM, Darren J Moffat wrote: > Alan.M.Wright wrote: >> Providing this as a temporary solution to relieve a customer problem >> is excellent. My disagreement is that it should be committed as a >> long term solution for offline support when we already have a defined >> system attribute mechanism that could be used to solve the problem >> via libc. > > Given the above I'm derailing this case for the purpose of writing an > opinion with Advice to fund the above mentioned project and to point > out the issue of adding Solaris/Sun functionality to Samba with no > planned match for the in kernel CIFS server. > > PSARC members please are you willing to vote based on the above our > would you like to see draft opinion text first. I've marked the case > as "waiting need vote" for now. > > Note that this is *derail* not *deny* (though depending on the vote it > could be but I doubt it). > -- --------------------------------------------------------------------- Rick Matthews email: Rick.Matthews at sun.com Sun Microsystems, Inc. phone:+1(651) 554-1518 1270 Eagan Industrial Road phone(internal): 54418 Suite 160 fax: +1(651) 554-1540 Eagan, MN 55121-1231 USA main: +1(651) 554-1500 ---------------------------------------------------------------------
