Brian Utterback wrote:
> The case was approved with only a single package and separate
> integration into ON. Does anybody care enough to want to re-open the
> case, or are we really just talking about getting IPS guidance for the
> future?
I doubt anyone cares enough to reopen the case. The details of this
issue (particularly whether the rbac is delivered as a separate root
package or as part of a stock ON package) IMO fall below the threshold
of ARC review.
-- Garrett
>
> Nicolas Williams wrote:
>> [Good points about splitting pkgs vs. spanning consolidations elided.]
>>
>> Perhaps the best answer is: do as always until IPS is delivered and SVR4
>> packaging dead. "As always" here would probably be the c-team's
>> preference. The root pkg name should probably be Volatile.
>>
>> Nico
>
