Brian Utterback wrote: > > > James C. McPherson wrote: > >> No doubt we'd need to have one for duff(1), dufflite(1) and duffzero(1), >> and another one for fosters(1) too, with a See Also that mentions both >> bud(1) and coors(1). > > Can these be made compatible? Instead of duplicating the code > needlessly, perhaps we could have a single executable, ontap(1) > with a "brand" flag, "-b" that would specify the particular flavor to > dispense? If necessary, we could still have the individual commands via > links to the ontap command, which would cause the ontap command to > behave as if it were called like this: "ontap -b $0".
Given my mental image of duff(1), dufflite(1) and duffzero(1) from the "Homer and Barney go on the Duff Brewery Tour" episode[1], I think that would be perfectly acceptable :-) [1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Duffless James C. McPherson -- Senior Kernel Software Engineer, Solaris Sun Microsystems http://blogs.sun.com/jmcp http://www.jmcp.homeunix.com/blog
