Danek Duvall wrote: > On Fri, Apr 04, 2008 at 07:39:47PM +0100, Darren J Moffat wrote: > >> I have no issue with the removal per say. Even though I personally do use >> hgmerge - though I use a modified version of it in ~/bin/hgmerge (modified >> to run twmerge or gpyfm). > > That'll continue to work, actually. Mercurial will still fall back to > hgmerge if it's found in your path. > >> However I'm confused as to why this is being done as a standalone case >> rather than as part of a case that introduces Mercurial 1.0 ? > > Mostly because the changes introduced are below the level that the ARC is > interested in. I know of no other incompatible change, and the rest of the > change includes new modules (which wasn't something I'd exported in the > original case), and a few new options to existing commands.
That is what I expected. Super, roll on hg 1.0 !! -- Darren J Moffat
