Nicolas Williams wrote:
> IMO not all configuration files can have admin CLIs/APIs/GUIs without
> enormous expense, and maybe some can't really have any that are all that
> great (think pam.conf(4)[*]).
>
> ZFS audit SACLs ought to take care of the auditing issue (though, of
> course, turning on file auditing will take care of it now).
>
> [*] PSARC/2005/275 will make it so we can deal with PAM profiles, but
> at the end of the day, what tool could really help you edit a PAM
> profile? pam.conf is almost a language.
>
This project introduces additional configuration *beyond* pam.conf.
-- Garrett
