Octave Orgeron writes: > Looks good. But I was wondering if the /usr/apache2 directory makes > sense? I mean when apache 3.x comes out, will that mean that we'll have > apache, apache2, and apache3 directories in /usr? I saw with the PSARC > for PHP, the route was /usr/<app>/<version> kinda like how we do Java > and Perl today. Should the apache versions be reorganized to follow > this as well?
It's a good question. The original reason for /usr/apache and /usr/apache2 was to allow for a transition between incompatible versions -- presumably, /usr/apache would go away after a new Solaris release. If we're no longer caring about maintaining compatibility for Apache (that is, we're willing to place incompatible bits in the same location), then I'd argue that there's no real reason to have the two separate directories anymore, and we should just collapse them. -- James Carlson, Solaris Networking <james.d.carlson at sun.com> Sun Microsystems / 1 Network Drive 71.232W Vox +1 781 442 2084 MS UBUR02-212 / Burlington MA 01803-2757 42.496N Fax +1 781 442 1677
