So are we going with keeping apache2, doing apache2.2, or collapsing the apaches into apache/<version> ?
Octave --- Stefan Teleman <Stefan.Teleman at Sun.COM> wrote: > James Falkner wrote: > > Stefan Teleman wrote: > > > >> I do not have a strong preference for either keeping /usr/apache2 > and > >> creating /usr/apache2.2, or just overwriting /usr/apache2. Valid > >> arguments can be made for either approach: > > > > Don't forget /etc/apache, /etc/apache2, /var/apache, and > /var/apache2. > > Will we have 2.2-equivalents for those as well? > > Yes, i belive that, keeping things consistent, if the decision for > the 2.2.4 > location ends up being /usr/apache2.2, then the corresponding > locations in /etc > and /var should reflect this approach as well. > > --Stefan > > -- > Stefan Teleman > Sun Microsystems, Inc. > Stefan.Teleman at Sun.COM > > *-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-* Octave J. Orgeron Solaris Systems Engineer http://www.opensolaris.org/os/community/sysadmin/ http://unixconsole.blogspot.com unixconsole at yahoo.com *-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-* ____________________________________________________________________________________ Sucker-punch spam with award-winning protection. Try the free Yahoo! Mail Beta. http://advision.webevents.yahoo.com/mailbeta/features_spam.html
