Joseph Kowalski wrote: > Of course, the flaw here is many of our customer do upgrade, but skip > releases (old data: circa 5.5-5.8), so this doesn't work for them. > > That said, I'm comfortable with the approach. We gave them a viable path.
Yes, it's not perfect but it is in line with our general EOF policy - you get a full release between the EOF being declared and the feature being removed - and we do publish EOF notices for perl. -- Alan Burlison --
