Brian, etc. all:

See my answer in-line below.

Please see the updated proposal according to all of the comments.
See the attchemnt.

Thanks,
Henry

Brian Cameron ??:
> 
> Henry:
> 
>>> Sections 3.1, 3.4, 4.1, and 4.4 all discuss that Gkrellm supports
>>> plugins, but there is no information about plugins in the exported
>>> interface table.  How can it support a plugin framework without
>>> exporting any related interfaces?
>> Sure, it export /usr/include/gkrellm2/gkrellm.h, in which the 
>> structure GkrellmMonitor is listed, it's used to record all plugin 
>> relative functions. I will add it to export interface of the proposal.
> 
> After I've written a plugin, how do I integrate it into the GKrellM
> infrastructure.  Do plugins have to be installed in a particular
> location, for example, for them to be loaded by the GKrellM daemon?
> 
> If so, this plugin directory (or whatever interface is used) should be
> highlighted in the ARC materials and the manpage.
Yes, generally the plugin is stroed under /usr/lib/gkrellm2/plugins, and 
I have added it to the one-pager, and it have been in the manpage.
> 
>>>>   4.11. Security Impact:
>>>>
>>>>         There is no additional security impact for Solaris.
>>> How can something which uses OpenSSL, has a plugin framework, and allows
>>> remote observation of a network's health have no security impact?
>> I think there is some general security problem when an application 
>> connect to network, it may exist all applications using OpenSSL/plugin.
>> I will add some words to identify that this application is using 
>> OpenSSL, and support plugin to transfer system status information.
> 
> Is it possible for a person to write a plugin that does something
> malicious?  What protects the system from malicious plugins?  Can
> only the sysadmin install new plugins, for example?
Yes, only sysadmin can install the plugins.
> 
> What protects the traffic between the remote and local machine from
> malicious snooping?  I'd guess OpenSSL is being used for this.  I'm
> just saying that the answer should be more fleshed out.  "None" isn't
> a good answer in this case.
OK, I have added some words on it into the one-pager.
> 
-------------- next part --------------
An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed...
Name: one-pager-gkrellm.txt
URL: 
<http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/opensolaris-arc/attachments/20080814/8e10dbeb/attachment.txt>

Reply via email to