Artem Kachitchkine wrote:
> Nicolas Williams wrote:
>> On Tue, Sep 04, 2007 at 12:50:43PM -0700, Danek Duvall wrote:
>>> On Tue, Sep 04, 2007 at 02:12:18PM -0500, Norm Jacobs wrote:
>>>> I can envision a time when we might want to update it to recognize
>>>> more
>>>> device types. If we were to break this down to device-type and
>>>> method, I
>>>> would change the service name and authorization as follows:
>>>>
>>>> svc:/network/device-discovery/printers:snmp
>>>> solaris.smf.{manage|value}.discovery.printers.snmp
>>> Okay. My only question here, then, is whether the migration from the
>>> proposed FMRI and authorization strings to these potential future
>>> ones is
>>> painless. Can both FMRIs exist on a system at the same time? I can't
>>> think of too many network devices at the moment -- only scanners
>>> come to
>>> mind (would storage fall in this category?) -- so maybe it's okay
>>> not to
>>> prepare for them immediately.
>>
>> Change it now... It'll be much better that way.
>>
>> I can certainly imagine other devices that one might want to
>> auto-discover. E.g., SunSPOT-type appliances.
>
> Was there a closure on this issue?
The proposal should be considered changed as mentioned above.
-Norm
