Gary Winiger writes: > + See also PSARC/2002/762 Layered Trusted Solaris > > + http://opensolaris.org/os/community/arc/caselog/2002/762 > > Specifically to John's thoughtful comments, yes, projects > can always ignore a question from ignorance and adding labeled > security to the list of unintended consequences doesn't really > change that. The previous for of question 5 presupposed > understanding of a number of other security concepts. Case owners > are ultimately responsible for helping/guiding projects > understanding. > > Gary.. > P.S. When the case log comes back on line, 2002/762 should be > viewable. I've redacted it.
That link is actually now: http://arc.opensolaris.org/caselog/PSARC/2002/762/ Note that it's on a different host, and it works differently than it did in the past. The materials appear to be present and complete. -- James Carlson, Solaris Networking <james.d.carlson at sun.com> Sun Microsystems / 35 Network Drive 71.232W Vox +1 781 442 2084 MS UBUR02-212 / Burlington MA 01803-2757 42.496N Fax +1 781 442 1677
