Scott Rotondo <scott.rotondo at sun.com> wrote:
> Changing or removing /etc/default/rmt wouldn't make a difference. After
> all, it's a configurable interface and the customer could put back
> whatever contents we remove, right?
>
> The point is that we're inferring from the sample config file that the
> rmt code makes access control decisions (since those decisions are
> configured in the file). It's the presence of the code, not the
> particular configuration file, that leads to the audit requirement.
It would be much easier to discuss if you first explain why you believe that
rmt needs something that is not required for similar other code in Solaris.
J?rg
--
EMail:joerg at schily.isdn.cs.tu-berlin.de (home) J?rg Schilling D-13353 Berlin
js at cs.tu-berlin.de (uni)
schilling at fokus.fraunhofer.de (work) Blog:
http://schily.blogspot.com/
URL: http://cdrecord.berlios.de/old/private/ ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/schily
