<insert Torrey's standard rant about doing architecture reviews over email is nuts to begin with> <insert Torrey's standard rant about architecture reviews require better tools>
P.S. John I took you off the cc list. :-) Darren Reed wrote: > In all of this emailing, can I please ask for something simple: > > MIND YOUR CC-list! > > We *all* read psarc@/psarc-ext@ and chances are that after three > or four replies, people that partook in it early on don't need to > receive their own personalised copy. > > Here's a suggestion: if you're not quoting text from someone in > your email, give some thought about whether or not they need > to be in the CC list before blindly hitting "Send". And yes, having > to delete duplicate copies of email that are no longer interesting > becomes a waste of time too. > > That's not asking too much, is it? > > Thanks, > Darren > > John Plocher wrote: > >> 300+ messages from 24 different people in the mail log for a >> fasttrack??? >> >> 76 From: Joerg Schilling >> 51 From: Garrett D'Amore >> 34 From: Margot Miller >> 30 From: Joseph Kowalski >> 16 From: Ken Erickson and Gary Winiger >> 14 From: Darren J Moffat >> 9 From: Shawn Walker and Nicolas Williams >> 8 From: Casper Dik >> 6 From: Alan Coopersmith >> 5 From: Scott Rotondo and James Carlson >> 4 From: John Plocher, Glenn Fowler, Darren Reed and James C. >> McPherson >> 2 From: Rick Matthews, Jyri Virkki, Don Cragun and Andrew >> Gabriel >> 1 From: Richard Lowe, Liane Praza, Kyle McDonald and Mark A. >> Carlson >> >> What the heck are we doing here? How did this FASTTRACK review >> get so out of control? A little blood in the water and we all >> turn into sharks and piranhas? Shame on us. >> >> I would like all of you to do some serious soul searching here - as >> ARC members, spectators and project team members - about what should >> we have done differently and what *must* we change going forward so >> this embarrassing, demeaning and counterproductive behavior CAN NOT >> happen again. >> >> -John >> >> >> >> >
