Why don't you just set a timer on them then and make them fast tracks? I don't see any of the discussion so far leaning towards a derail.
Alternatively we could do a pre-inception Tuesday if you feel additional, more in-depth review will be warranted later. You really need to get a case owner anyway who can help you with the materials, etc. -- mark Brian Cameron wrote: > > Mark: > >> Yes. I also recall you were going to put some materials there and update >> later if needed. > > I created case LSARC 2009/432 and LSARC 2009/433 for ConsoleKit and > GDM last Tuesday after the LSARC meeting so that we could discuss at > the next meeting. > >> I just looked in the inception.materials directory and >> there are no materials. > > I probably made an error, then, when submitting the case. I think > this was the first case I have ever tried to submit as a full case. > I assumed that when I selected "O)nepager" when running sac_nextcase > that it would submit the case as a full case. > > I am guessing this was incorrect. What do I need to do to mark this > case as an inception review? > > I am not aware of what needs to be done with the inception.materials > directory. Can I get help to fix this? > >> Are you planning to have more that the one-pager for these cases? > > I tried to fully document all the interfaces in the one-pagers, > and was thinking that these documents should be sufficient for the > review. If LSARC feels additional documentation is needed, just > let me know. > >> When we didn't see any materials last Thursday Asa canceled the >> meeting. What do you want to do? > > I was hoping we could still have the inception review on Tuesday > if possible. A lot of people have commented on the case already, > so I think ARC members are familiar with the case and related issues > by now. I can write up a summary of issues to discuss before the > meeting to help focus our discussion during the meeting. > > Brian > > >> Brian Cameron wrote: >>> >>> At last Tuesday's LSARC meeting, I had made arrangements to have >>> a half-hour inception review for ConsoleKit (LSARC 2009/432) and >>> the GDM Rewrite case (LSARC 2009/433). During the meeting, the >>> LSARC committee said that this would be arranged, but it does not >>> seem to be on the agenda. Is this an oversight? >>> >>> Brian >>> >>> >>> On 08/14/09 09:38, Asa Romberger wrote: >>>> http://www.opensolaris.org/os/community/arc/announcements/ >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> OpenSolaris ARC Agenda >>>> >>>> >>>> TELECONFERENCE NUMBERS: >>>> >>>> (866)545-5223 (Within US) >>>> (215) 446-3661 (International) >>>> ACCESS CODE 939-55-86 >>>> Times are US/Pacific Timezone >>>> ARC meetings are recorded. >>>> >>>> >>>> 08/18/2009 >>>> No meeting >>>> >>>> >>>> 08/19/2009 >>>> 10:00-10:10 Open ARC Business (use open dial in above) >>>> Fast-tracks as of 8/13/2009 >>>> Case (Timeout) Exposure Title >>>> 2009/330 (08/18/09) open Fast Crash Dump >>>> 2009/424 (08/14/09) open idzebra >>>> 2009/438 (08/20/09) closed Integrate HP Smart Array HBA Driver cpqary3 >>>> into Solaris >>>> 10:10-10:55 Open Inception: Anti-spoofing Link Protection (2009/436) >>>> Submitter: Eric Cheng >>>> Owner: Kais Belgaied >>>> Exposure: open >>>> 10:55-11:40 Open Commitment: Solaris Hotplug Framework (2008/181) >>>> Submitter: Colin Zou >>>> Owner: Garrett D'Amore >>>> Intern: Phi Tran >>>> Exposure: open >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> opensolaris-arc mailing list >>>> opensolaris-arc at opensolaris.org >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> opensolaris-arc mailing list >>> opensolaris-arc at opensolaris.org >> >> -- >> <http://www.sun.com> * Mark A. Carlson * >> Sr. Architect >> >> *Systems Group* >> Phone x69559 / 303-223-6139 >> Email Mark.Carlson at Sun.COM >> >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > opensolaris-arc mailing list > opensolaris-arc at opensolaris.org -- <http://www.sun.com> * Mark A. Carlson * Sr. Architect *Systems Group* Phone x69559 / 303-223-6139 Email Mark.Carlson at Sun.COM
