Brian Cameron wrote:
> - Alan Coopersmith raised the issue that we need a follow-up case to
>   EOL CDE Login.  Personally I think that it would make more sense if
>   the engineers within the Desktop team who are responsible for CDE
>   login were to follow-up with such a case.  It would be better, I
>   think, if those people who best understand how CDE login works were
>   to be responsible for such a case and answering questions about
>   how the transition will be managed, etc.

While EOL'ing dtlogin can be a separate case, this case must go forward
with gdm as default, since we know that has happened without ARC review
already.   Things that were treated in previous gdm ARC cases as advice
of "before gdm becomes the default login screen" must be treated as TCR's
or TCA's for the "now that gdm is default" get-well plan.   Pretending
that gdm is not default is irresponsible and ignoring the reality of our
existing OpenSolaris releases, and all Nevada builds 128 and later.

-- 
        -Alan Coopersmith-           alan.coopersmith at sun.com
         Sun Microsystems, Inc. - X Window System Engineering


Reply via email to