Garrett D'Amore writes:
> Its "closed" meaning I didn't expect this to be controversial at all.
> Why do you believe that this case is controversial? (If you're
*This* case isn't too controversial, although I happen to have both SBus
machines and one of those cards, so I'm affected, but it isn't really bad.
> referring to PSARC 2009/572, that *was* run as closed, and I happen to
> share your sentiment.)
Indeed I was, and I consider this to be a slap in the community's face: it
is well known that some non-Sun distributions added my hack to re-enable
UltraSPARC I support, and I have a sponsor to have it added back to
Nevada. So there is considerable community interest, and this is being
sneaked in like this ;-( Not what I consider proper procedure.
Rainer
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rainer Orth, Center for Biotechnology, Bielefeld University
