The compiler project team has promised in spoken and written word to
deliver Ada support with the next case. LSARC/2009/575 is this next
case.
Should a project team allowed to promise a place in heaven, later
break their word and get away with this?
2009/11/5 Rainer Orth <ro at techfak.uni-bielefeld.de>:
> =?KOI8-R?B?z8zYx8Egy9LZ1sHOz9fTy8HR?= writes:
>
>> Ada language support was not addressed, too. This is the second time
>> the compiler project team is not implementing support.
>
> I think this (and Java support) could and should be separate cases. Most
> likely, the community can help here. Especially doing Ada is somewhat hard
> due to the bootstrap issue: you need a working Ada compiler (GNAT in
> particular) on all the build machines to properly build Ada.
>
>> How do I appeal a PSARC case?
>
> Good question: completely ignoring a considerable set of questions and
> objections doesn't seem right.
>
> Rainer
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Rainer Orth, Center for Biotechnology, Bielefeld University
>
--
, _ _ ,
{ \/`o;====- Olga Kryzhanovska -====;o`\/ }
.----'-/`-/ olga.kryzhanovska at gmail.com \-`\-'----.
`'-..-| / Solaris/BSD//C/C++ programmer \ |-..-'`
/\/\ /\/\
`--` `--`
