Darren J Moffat wrote:
> I think audioctl is a better name. However given the nature of
> mixerctl I personally would be okay approving incompatible changes to
> it for a Minor release binding.
>
> If it is trivial enough to keep mixerctl around with its current CLI
> and introduce audioctl, then great that sounds even better.
So what I've done is "revert" mixerctl to its pre-Boomer CLI (modulo
some feature differences -- we don't support the old Solaris 10
audio_info structure, and you obviously cannot "disable" the mixer.)
The intent here is that mixerctl will go to Obsolete status, and
audioctl will be the "new" interface.
I'll send out an updated spec later today.
- Garrett
>
> --
> Darren J Moffat
