On Wed, Jun 09, 2010 at 02:15:56AM -0700, Richard L. Hamilton wrote: > Of those you just mentioned, it might be worth keeping sun4m for awhile, > since AFAIK Solaris 9 (last that could run on sun4m) is still supported, and > thus a script might exist such that it would still be true on Solaris 9 > (and might be a nice gesture for it to be silently false on newer versions > rather than false with shell error messages). The sun4m link could always > be removed later, when no longer true on any still-supported version.
Makes sense. Thanks, Venky. _______________________________________________ opensolaris-arc mailing list opensolaris-arc@opensolaris.org
