On Wed, Jun 09, 2010 at 02:15:56AM -0700, Richard L. Hamilton wrote:
> Of those you just mentioned, it might be worth keeping sun4m for awhile,
> since AFAIK Solaris 9 (last that could run on sun4m) is still supported, and
> thus a script might exist such that it would still be true on Solaris 9
> (and might be a nice gesture for it to be silently false on newer versions
> rather than false with shell error messages).  The sun4m link could always
> be removed later, when no longer true on any still-supported version.

Makes sense.

Thanks,
Venky.
_______________________________________________
opensolaris-arc mailing list
opensolaris-arc@opensolaris.org

Reply via email to